One of my favourite words, after the word why is context. I love that word context, because it gives real meaning to various conversations and/or situations. Tendai Biti spoke to some journalists yesterday and this is what he said “Last week when we paid civil servants there was $217 in government coffers”. I spent most of the earlier part of the morning on social media trying to add my own context to this story. You see, we prefer to hear and/or read negative stories when it comes to Zimbabwe and when we hear stories like this especially from a government minister, we are extremely alarmed and we share that story with others like our lives depended on it. The reality is our government needs the money – desperately actually but we also need context so those who don’t fully understand or appreciate the Zimbabwean landscape can understand such alarmist statements.
To illustrate my point, I go back to the very beginning of our multi-currency era. The government started off with zero pretty much like how the majority of the country did and yet, government had to pay civil servants within a matter of weeks. They made a plan and the civil servants were paid. It has since been widely reported that we have often missed our income targets and our expenses, well….our expenses (mainly salaries) gobble up a large percentage of our income. The government has struggled since the very beginning to address this imbalance. There is nothing new about this situation. We survived then and I have every confidence that we will survive this.
I believe Biti may have wasted an opportunity to fully explain his concerns and his concerns are very valid by the way. We don’t have sufficient funds to get certain things done – we just don’t! We the people want to know why and yet we don’t ask as often as we should. It is common knowledge that we plan to hold a referendum and the much anticipated elections this year. The main issue we seem to have is the funding for such an expensive and vital exercise. Where will the money come from? If this was Biti’s way of expressing these concerns and perhaps frustrations, then he didn’t give us the much needed context nor did he articulate himself in a way that we the people understood. Instead, the international media fraternity ran the $217 story all day and sadly we the people shared that story with our network without asking if this story actually makes sense. Sadly we the people didn’t really ask what the real issues at play are.
While I was actually writing this article, I stumbled across the Business Day article where Biti ‘rubbished reports that there was $217 left in government coffers’. Now I wait to see the reaction over the next couple of days.
Till then
Aluta continua







Jayne
31/01/2013
Well I think first of all someone in government needs to explain to the people where the profits from the diamonds & platinum are going…there is a big elephant in the room & there is absolutely no excuse for the situation they find themselves in.
Sir Nigel
31/01/2013
Yes this is true, increased accountability and transparency is paramount especially now. Our country continues to struggle YET we’re also told that we have one of the largest diamond deposits in the world.The general public find it hard to marry the two scenarios: this potential wealth and our current status quo.
patrick
31/01/2013
With all due respect Nige Negative reporting in not unique to Zim related issues, to be fair people ran with what the Minister put out there, remember this chap is the same guy who spoke of “Dezezururising” government, he suffers from cronic foot-in-mouth syndrome. Methinks we’d all be best served if this chap made use of a professional spokesman going forward!
Sir Nigel
31/01/2013
There is nothing wrong with negative reporting HOWEVER it is also important to keep it balanced. Tell the truth. There’s nothing wrong with the truth hey – nothing. Yes we are all concerned about violence and events that took place in 2008, however I wouldn’t say we’re stuck in this ‘doom and gloom’ era right now. We’re pensive.
Re Biti and his comments, these concerns needed to be said at some point. Where is the money going and where are we going to get money to the hold these elections? Why are we still struggling when we have all these diamond deposits etc? I don’t disagree with Biti on that issue. What I think is important to give the statements context to that we don’t end up in the current situation. I also think tact is useful for situations like this as well.
christont
31/01/2013
I think in this instance media houses running this story just want to score cheap publicity points. Its ridiculous to think a country has $217 in it’s account for the whole year! There was a whole story to those words he said. He din’t just get up and say we have 217 and sit down. No! Any of the media houses running that story without context or full facts is acting stupidly I’m afraid, because a simple conversation with an economist will tell you that a government cannot have just $217 in their account. What the minister meant is that we only eat what we kill and at the last eating session we were left with scraps but we will of course go hunting again the next morning. Most of these media houses are always looking for a story about Zimbabwe and at the sight of that one sentence they ran with it without explaining more on the story which I think is very low journalism. America has an overall negative balance but they still pay for things. People should stop Zimbabwe-bashing!
Sir Nigel
08/02/2013
This is what I was afraid of: Biti reckless statement causes shivers in Spain – http://www.herald.co.zw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=66397%3Abiti-reckless-statement-causes-shivers-in-spain&catid=37%3Atop-stories&Itemid=130#.URSxS6VaySp